Analytical Thinkers are reserved, quiet persons. They like to get to the bottom of things - curiosity is one of their strongest motives. They want to know what holds the world together deep down inside. They do not really need much more to be happy because they are modest persons. Many mathematicians, philosophers and scientists belong to this type. Analytical Thinkers loathe contradictions and illogicalness; with their sharp intellect, they quickly and comprehensively grasp patterns, principles and structures. They are particularly interested in the fundamental nature of things and theoretical findings; for them, it is not necessarily a question of translating these into practical acts or in sharing their considerations with others. Analytical Thinkers like to work alone; their ability to concentrate is more marked than that of all other personality types. They are open for and interested in new information.

Analytical Thinkers have little interest in everyday concerns - they are always a little like an “absent-minded professor” whose home and workplace are chaotic and who only concerns himself with banalities such as bodily needs when it becomes absolutely unavoidable. The acknowledgement of their work by others does not play a great role for them; in general,they are quite independent of social relationships and very self-reliant. Analytical Thinkers therefore often give others the impression that they are arrogant or snobby - especially because they do not hesitate to speak their mind with their often harsh (even if justified) criticism and their imperturbable self-confidence. Incompetent contemporaries do not have it easy with them. But whoever succeeds in winning their respect and interest has a witty and very intelligent person to talk to. A partner who amazes one with his excellent powers of observation and his very dry humour.

It takes some time before Analytical Thinkers make friends, but then they are mostly friends for life. They only need very few people around them. Their most important ability is to be a match for them and thus give them inspiration. Constant social obligations quickly get on their nerves; they need a lot of time alone and often withdraw from others. Their partner must respect this and understand that this is not due to the lack of affection. Once they have decided in favour of a person, Analytical Thinkers are loyal and reliable partners. However, one cannot expect romance and effusive expressions of feelings from them and they will definitely forget their wedding anniversary. But they are always up to a night spent with stimulating discussions and a good glass of wine!

Adjectives which describe your type: introverted, theoretical, logical, spontaneous, rational, analytical, intellectual, sceptical, pensive, critical, quiet, precise, independent, creative, inventive, abstract, eccentric, curious, reserved, self-involved, imaginative, unsociable, determined, modest, careful, incommunicative, witty

and the love

When falling in love, you can turn into a real surprise package! Normally those around you probably see you like most Thinkers as slightly preoccupied, a little absentminded, maybe even a little arrogant. You also give the impression of being quiet, cool, distanced and deliberate - everything is true. It is also true that you rarely fall in love because your expectations of your partner are very high and only very few will meet them.

However, when it happens to you, things - especially for an introverted Thinker - can get pretty intense. Then you even throw your previous taciturnity overboard, and compared to your normal behavior, you get loquacious and drippy. But that usually doesn’t last long, as soon your analytical and rational part returns from its vacation, puts the entire matter under a microscope without mercy, and woe to your partner if he/she did not reach the required standards in some respect! You have a very clear mental picture of your expectations and in this respect you are much too hardheaded and stubborn to be ready for any compromises. You would rather be alone than to put up with the second best, thank you very much.

For your partner, the change from the love poem writing, romantic Romeo, to the cool strategist, is sometimes rather bewildering and not easy to deal with. Here, they think they have hooked the great romantic, and in reality you belong to the most unemotional and logical types around. If your counterpart is a very emotional type, this cold shower can lead to a few problems between you because, after the initial effusiveness is gone, he/she won’t be able to squeeze all that many declarations of feelings and vows of love out of you. Once the courtship period is over, you simply don’t see the necessity any longer. Emotions are suspect to you anyway, because they are capricious and you give your partner only occasionally a glimpse into your innermost feelings. That hurts many types very much and makes them feel rejected and taken for granted. You, on the other hand, are uncomfortable if you feel pushed into an intimacy you don’t like, and frequently you don’t understand what your partner expects of you.

Ultimately i am a walking paradox lol bound to go bi-polar

http://www.ipersonic.com

You say 50Cent-I Say Led Zeppelin
You say Miley Cyrus-I say AC/DC
You say T-Pain-I say Deep Purple
You say Flowers-I say Van Halen
You say Pink-I say Pink Floyd
You say Hip Hop-i say Jimi Hendrix
You say R&B-I scream Classic Rock
You say hanah montana-i hit you in the face
70% of teenagers have turned to Hip Hop and Rap.If you are part of the 30% that still listen to real music,copy and paste this message to another 5 videos.
DON'T LET THE SPIRIT rock die

made me go lol, wonder if the 70/30 ratio is true since nothing lies like statistics

Religion throughout human history from antiquity to perhaps 2012 has perhaps held the greatest hoard of corporeal wealth ; the Romans would worship unto their Gods loot from conquered territories and moving into the middle ages would see the rise in the coffers of the Papacy.Therefore it is perhaps no wonder that perhaps many would see the potential of abusing religion to attain wealth, as Ron Hubbard rightly puts "the only way to make any money...you start your own religion. Intrinsically it is perhaps by virtue of faith in religion that allows religion to be exploited into perhaps the ultimate Ponzi scheme.

Religion often works on the precepts of doing good while we are living therefore we can enjoy the fruits of our self deprivation in death. The epitome of such a concept lies in karma, however the implications of such a concept is perhaps the perfect opportunity for a Ponzi scheme. Given the assumption of faith, one would then do what is necessary to attain good karma to attain rewards beyond his life. However what this leads to is the opportunity for the "religious mentor" to guide the faithful into building up their karma by perhaps donating more generously in exchange for a better after life. Nonetheless by virtue that the concept of afterlife is uncertain itself, the rewards are perhaps as real as the returns of your Ponzi scheme.

More often than not the faith of the believers towards their deity is manifested in their Earthly proponents; the holy man. What this allow, is for the "holy man" to abuse the faith of the faithful which blinds the believer to what is logical. Perhaps the best in case in point to illustrate how faith can blind would be Nithyananda Swami "holy man" scandal. Hindu Holy man are often associated with their ability to overcome necessities of man; physiological needs such as sleep, sex and water. This ability is their claim to religious superiority thus logically if one is to believe the other is holy, the other must be able to abstain which in the case Nithyananda Swami,failed. Thus in essence highlighting the ability of faith to blind. Therefore the "holyman" are your Ponzi clones and perhaps hold the greatest responsibility in the grand scheme of things.

The case for evangelism. A Ponzi scheme constantly requires new members to fill the supposed gains in the finances, this is perhaps somewhat similar to religion. More often than not a common yardstick for the "power of the religion" lies in the number of coverts due to the inability to measure the intangible. Concurrently however a bigger pool of believers, is also a bigger pool of wealth. Christians tithe 10% of their wealth logically more 10 percents = greater wealth, case in point, City harvest's with a relatively large congregation having the ability to purchase a 310 million dollars premise. This by implication allows the leaders of religious groups to use the reason of spreading the faith to attain more tithes for reasons perhaps less than glorifying.

Perhaps to safeguard the name of religion and no doubt it's importance, is to strip religion to it's bare minimum ; it's core. To be honest, is there the need for an over the top building with fancy acoustics to worship in? Or is there even a need for statues made of pure gold. The truth is perhaps otherwise, religious deities more often than not border between material poverty and monetary poverty. Monuments are perhaps more for human pride than the glory of God.

At the end of the day it is perhaps easier to safeguard your faith, to hold two key ideas to heart, to walk strong in faith and to keep true to the word. For something as intangible as faith, it is impossible to measure truth, when credibility is based on faith and by virtue, intangible. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely, the faith in God should not be placed into the hands of the daily man.